From Bookish controversies, we turn now to the reality of politics and war on the Continent. The historian Arnold Toynbye has pointed out the following historical trend. In recent Western history there has been a first bout of wars,
Shortly after the peace treaty between Louis and William, Louis began negotiations between himself and William as to the Future of Spain, Whose king, Charles II, lay dying. Their treaty stated they would let the second son of Emperor Leopold I of the Holy Roman Empire became the King of Spain, and Louis would receive portions of the lands if the dying Charles II. The emperor, however would not support the partition of the Spanish empire, for he wanted all the Spanish heritage. To Louis' surprise, his own second grandson was named heir to the Spanish throne by Charles II. To benefit his own dynasty, Louis XIV accepted his will, thereby breaking his agreement with William of England and Holland, William was angry but his countries were not interested in revenge for this offense. However, Louis did not "leave good enough alone"; he took some border fortresses some border fortresses from the Dutch, issued commercial decrees to the disadvantage of the English and Dutch trading ships, and proclaimed the son of the late James II as the rightful King of England. Then popular English and Dutch fury did rise against France. England and Holland joined with the Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, The King of Prussia and other German princes for the purpose of breaking up the potential France-Spanish combination.143 The alignment of opposing sides resulted in the start of the war of the Spanish Succession in the winter of 1701-1702. William died shortly after the start of the war.144As usual, at times of national significance. Stennett expressed himself to his associates in poetry.145 He called the people to
The ever patriotic Protestant, Joseph Stennett preached a special sermon on the day of thanksgiving for the victory, September 7, 1704.150 His text was Judges 5: 31: "So let all thy enemies perish, O Lord: But let them that love Him be as the sun when he goes forth in his might." Stennett calls the battle "the eminent victory God had lately given his church over their enemies."151 To a twentieth century Christian thinker the initial problem with this text and attitude would be whether or not God sends out special direct physical benefits to his church or its members today. The author of this thesis would hold that physically God does not specially reward the "righteous": God "makes his rain fall on the just and the unjust alike." Stennett likewise apparently felt that outright physical blessing did not occur in the case of the victory, but that
Although that is the major problem to the twentieth century thinker, to Stennett, the most important problem is this: the verse is imprecatory, it seems to rain everlasting ruin on some persons. The 69th Psalm and some other Scriptures desire God to punish Judas and some other enemies of God and his church. This, says Stennett, is an unsuitable attitude when one considers the "mild and forgiving temper" of the gospels, "by which we are taught to love our enemies." However, all of the Scripture, says Joseph, is inspired by the Holy Spirit so that nothing can be "inconsistent";153 one must arrive at some reconciliation. Stennett says,
As to public enemies, he says,
Stennett defended the allied cause as right, for the French had persecuted Protestants and had been trying to tyrannize all Europe.158 The sermon has a surprise ending. The day on which the sermon was preached was the day of thanksgiving commemorating the victory. Stennett points out that according to Ester 9: 22, the feast of Purim, as a feast of thanksgiving, was also a day to exercise charity. Accordingly, Stennett called for the people to give their bounty to the needs of the poor159 What a surprise ending for a political occasion! This sermon, it seems to me, was outstanding in its time because of its wrestling with theological problems and its Christian attitude and application. When it was printed, someone gave a copy to Queen Anne. She was highly impressed with it, and ordered him a gratuity out of the privy purse (her personal income). The humble Stennett did not try to spread the news of this honor, and had it not been for the man who delivered the royal messages, few would have known of the honor.160 Stennett had now become quite well known, for his hymns, his book on baptism, and the sermon we have just mentioned Because of this, he to have "several considerable offers" to become a minister in the Church of England. Yet even with the pressure of a large family and low financial income, he would not let himself be really tempted to give up his Dissenter principles.161 |
![]()
![]()